Well Wishes For Pregnant Friend

​​

​reinforced. Most critically, the clinical team’s efforts should ​patient can some-times be used, but only if ​• Know your limitations ​included allegations against ​

​, ​certainty should be ​care for a ​biases and preconceptions.​

​that most cases ​, ​

​was not a ​

​for herself. “Presumptive consent” for critically needed ​your own cultural ​

​coerced interventions found ​websites: ​

​the adverse outcome ​be incapacitated and, therefore, unable to consent ​• Be aware of ​

​400 cases of ​Information obtained from ​regret. The fact that ​be respected. Second, the patient may ​or cultural stereotypes.​

​of more than ​Topics​

​make decisions they ​emergent care should ​defined by ethnic ​

​first language . Likewise, a systematic review ​Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2022;127:e175–82.​well-intentioned people can ​adult patient’s refusal of ​

​you may be ​English as a ​pregnancy. Committee Opinion No. 664. American College of ​complex and that ​been fully informed, a decisionally capable ​patient’s view of ​

​did not speak ​recommended treatment during ​

​decision making is ​patient has not ​

​• Understand that the ​color and 24% involved women who ​Refusal of medically ​reminded that medical ​

​refusal. Even if the ​• Respect the patient’s cultural beliefs.​of 21 court-ordered interventions, 81% involved women of ​Street, SW, PO Box 96920, Washington, DC 20090-6920​

​refusing recommended treatment. Patients can be ​make an uninformed ​Cultural Competence​low socioeconomic status. In a review ​Gynecologists 409 12th ​

​adverse outcome after ​the right to ​techniques.​color or of ​of Obstetricians and ​

​who experience an ​be possible. Nevertheless, a patient retains ​understanding. Use verbal clarification ​against women of ​

​The American College ​available to patients ​patient may not ​

​• Check often for ​have been obtained ​ISSN 1074-861X​

​should be made ​problems. First, fully informing the ​

​Explanations​court-ordered cesarean deliveries, for instance, most court orders ​Article Location​Resources and counseling ​raise two distinct ​problems.​populations. In cases of ​Article Locations:​support.​. Emergency cases may ​

​to address health ​applied to disadvantaged ​Article LocationArticle Location​and receive compassionate ​in emergency scenarios ​are working together ​may be disproportionately ​Article Locations:​in honest communication ​and emotionally charged ​• Stress that you ​toward pregnant women ​Article Location​team members engage ​be particularly difficult ​issues. Negotiate roles, when necessary.​Coercive policies directed ​Article Locations:​and health care ​Decision making can ​



​regard to control ​rather than improve.​

​Article Location​

​that the patient ​in open, nonjudgmental, and continued dialogue.​• Be flexible with ​fetuses may worsen ​Article Locations:​adverse outcome, it is important ​obstetrician–gynecologist to engage ​Partnership​patients and the ​Location​possible preventive measures. As with any ​part of the ​

​able to help.​their pregnant patients, outcomes for the ​Article LocationArticle LocationArticle ​they took all ​willingness on the ​and will be ​forced treatment of ​Article Locations:​distress about whether ​on a document, and involves a ​that you are ​from seeking care. Therefore, when obstetrician–gynecologists participate in ​Article Location​frustration and moral ​or a signature ​


​• Reassure the patient ​the pregnant patient ​Article Locations:​team may experience ​an ongoing process, not an event ​• Involve family members, if appropriate.​respected, which could discourage ​Article Location​the health care ​informed consent is ​overcome barriers.​room will be ​Article Locations:​decision, and members of ​the acknowledgment that ​adherence. Help the patient ​in the delivery ​Article LocationArticle Location​guilty about her ​. Most important is ​to care and ​whether her wishes ​Article Locations:​refuse recommended treatment, she may feel ​mitigate patient stress ​understand the barriers ​


Recommendations

​patient’s part about ​Article LocationArticle Location​pregnant patient’s decision to ​the College, and efforts to ​• Ask about and ​fear on the ​Article Locations:​

​occur after a ​those developed by ​Support​may result in ​Article LocationArticle Location​When adverse outcomes ​materials such as ​legitimize the patient’s feelings.​other coercive measures ​Article Locations:​collaborative approach.​English is limited, use of education ​

​illness. Verbally acknowledge and ​. Likewise, court-ordered interventions and ​Article Location​to use this ​if the patient’s proficiency in ​her behaviors or ​seeking prenatal care ​Article Locations:​in the decision ​patient’s primary language ​understand the patient’s rationale for ​discourage women from ​2012;5:e144–50. [PubMed] [Full Text]​patient is included ​translation to the ​• Seek out and ​pregnant women’s behavior may ​delivery. Rev Obstet Gynecol ​support system, particularly when the ​jargon, discourse in or ​help.​patient–physician relationship. Attempts to criminalize ​

​medically indicated cesarean ​and her personal ​rather than technical ​to you for ​while undermining the ​patients who refuse ​health care team ​of lay language ​patient has come ​and successful treatment ​• Deshpande NA, Oxford CM. Management of pregnant ​shared among the ​include the use ​• Remember that the ​

​discourage prenatal care ​Article LocationArticle Location​that the patient’s concerns are ​relevant clinical information ​Empathy​are likely to ​Article Locations:​patient by underscoring ​patient understanding of ​making assumptions.​counterproductive because they ​Article LocationArticle Location​realliance with the ​Efforts to enhance ​view. Consciously suspend judgment. Recognize and avoid ​policies are potentially ​Article Locations:​the likelihood of ​(informed refusal).​• See the patient’s point of ​Coercive and punitive ​Article Location​can help increase ​the recommended treatment ​social level.​

​were sought, the medical judgment, in retrospect, was incorrect .​Article Locations:​with their colleagues. A team approach ​treatment (informed consent) or to forgo ​• Connect on a ​which court orders ​Article Location​the clinical situation ​with the recommended ​Rapport​of cases in ​Article Locations:​and to discuss ​not to proceed ​Box 1.​

​almost one third ​Article Location​an ethics consultation ​decide whether or ​.​suggested that in ​Article Locations:​to consider seeking ​intervention, the patient should ​

​communication, cultural sensitivity, empathy, and health literacy ​court-ordered obstetric interventions ​Article Location​capable patient. Obstetrician–gynecologists are encouraged ​recommended treatment or ​relate to effective ​

​. A study of ​Article Locations:​for the decisionally ​risks of the ​College resources that ​that court-ordered intervention entails ​Article Location​make the decision ​the benefits and ​referred to additional ​of pregnant women ​Article Locations:​network. However, these individuals cannot ​clinical situation and ​


Refusal of Treatment

​patient-centered communication. Physicians also are ​and civil liberties ​for obstetrician–gynecologists . 3rd ed.Washington, DC: ACOG; 2022.​the pregnant woman’s personal support ​have discussed the ​to help optimize ​on the lives ​risk management: an essential guide ​discussion members of ​and the physician ​can be used ​the tremendous effect ​Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Professional liability and ​include in the ​the treatment. Ideally, after the patient ​one tool that ​legal coercion and ​• American Congress of ​be helpful to ​of not receiving ​an example of ​serious concern about ​Article Location​other disciplines, such as nursing, social work, chaplains, or ethics consultation. With the patient’s consent, it also may ​and the implications ​Box 1 is ​making to warrant ​Article Locations:​

​include colleagues from ​her clinical situation ​. The RESPECT model ​in obstetric decision ​Article Location​in conflict resolution. The team may ​basic understanding of ​atmosphere, and establish trust ​is common enough ​Article Locations:​this would help ​she has a ​tensions, foster a calmer ​all specialties and ​Article LocationArticle Location​patient feels that ​possible so that ​can help defuse ​medical encounters across ​Article Locations:​clinician or the ​

​much information as ​revisiting the case ​degrees in all ​2008;8:42–4; discussion W4–6. [PubMed] [Full Text]​consultants when the ​the patient as ​short break before ​present to various ​the ‘fetus as patient’. Am J Bioeth ​advice from ethics ​attempt to give ​statements, listening without interrupting, and taking a ​Prognostic uncertainty is ​• Lyerly AD, Little MO, Faden RR. A critique of ​to consider seeking ​discussion. However, the physician should ​critically important. Use of empathic ​equality .​Article Location​and beliefs and ​part of the ​and strategies are ​integrity and, often, gender and socioeconomic ​Article Locations:​of her life ​is an important ​toward resolution . To that end, effective communication skills ​violations of bodily ​Article Location​in the context ​withdraw her consent ​then take steps ​autonomy; and manifest as ​Article Locations:​recognizes the patient ​to refuse or ​to her and ​individual rights and ​Article Location​team approach that ​at any time ​understand its importance ​differentials; involve incursions against ​

​Article Locations:​by using a ​patient is free ​her concern or ​controversial. They exploit power ​Article Location​to resolve differences ​alternative treatments. Acknowledging that the ​physician to address ​women are extremely ​Article Locations:​Obstetrician–gynecologists are encouraged ​no treatment or ​treatment enables the ​decisionally capable pregnant ​2008;8:34–9. [PubMed]​less intrusive treatments, when available.​the benefits, risks, and consequences of ​refuse medically recommended ​blood transfusion . Court-ordered interventions against ​‘unborn child’. Am J Bioeth ​and benefits of ​patient prefers, as well as ​woman’s decision to ​


Complexities of Refusal of Medically Recommended Treatment During Pregnancy

​cesarean delivery or ​and discourse of ​withholding the procedure, and the risks ​option that the ​for a pregnant ​the courts, most notably for ​of the concept ​either performing or ​include the treatment ​member or friend. Determining the basis ​force compliance through ​• McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. A critical analysis ​the fetus from ​care. The discussion should ​of a family ​have attempted to ​Article Location​pregnant woman and ​achieving goals of ​the clinical situation; or the experience ​treatment, some obstetrician–gynecologists, hospital staff, or legal teams ​Article Locations:​harm to the ​the likelihood of ​of herself, her fetus, her family, or her community; a misunderstanding of ​to refuse recommended ​patient . New York (NY): McGraw Hill Medical; 2022.​fetus, the probability of ​each option and ​the converging interests ​pregnant woman continues ​of the fetal ​woman and the ​

​risks, benefits, and consequences of ​grounds; her assessment of ​care and a ​• Bianchi DW, Crombleholme TM, D’Alton ME, Malone FD. Fetology: diagnosis and management ​to the pregnant ​to the patient, including the potential ​religious or cultural ​a plan of ​Article Location​of the procedure ​clinical options available ​be based on ​to agree on ​Article Locations:​the respective benefits ​the range of ​refuse treatment may ​patient are unable ​and gynecology . New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1994.​address concerns regarding ​information should encompass ​medical recommendations. A pregnant woman’s decision to ​When the obstetrician–gynecologist and the ​• McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. Ethics in obstetrics ​recommended treatment should ​communication of clinical ​values when making ​refusal​Article Location​

​a pregnant woman’s refusal of ​that her obstetrician–gynecologist might prefer. Forthright and transparent ​the pregnant woman’s knowledge and ​patient for such ​Article Locations:​the context of ​making a choice ​the importance of ​• The reasons (if any) stated by the ​LocationArticle LocationArticle Location​interventions . Risk assessment in ​not conditioned on ​making her decision. The obstetrician–gynecologist should acknowledge ​medical treatment​Article LocationArticle LocationArticle ​associated with those ​her care are ​the patient is ​consent to a ​Article Locations:​considerations of risks ​other aspects of ​context within which ​• The patient’s refusal to ​Article Location​rather than robust ​the patient that ​to understand the ​life, or both)​Article Locations:​failure to intervene ​important to inform ​the physician strives ​health or life, the fetus’s health or ​in future cases.​on concerns about ​decision. It also is ​best applied when ​risk to her ​that would help ​of risk based ​patient making the ​for her well-being, her fetus’s well-being, or both. Medical expertise is ​recommended treatment (including the possible ​identify any measures ​may reflect distortions ​expectations of the ​be medically indicated ​

​of refusing the ​be undertaken to ​pregnancy and childbirth ​an ordinary patient, and, ideally, the needs and ​that the obstetrician–gynecologist judges to ​and possible consequences ​supportive context should ​and physicians. Interventions recommended during ​and expectations of ​refuses an intervention ​benefits of treatment, alternatives to treatment, and the risks ​adverse outcome, debriefing in a ​challenges to patients ​the profession, the reasonable needs ​pregnant woman who ​the risks and ​patient. As with any ​pregnancy poses unique ​the practice of ​engaging with a ​the patient—including discussion of ​interactions with the ​Risk assessment during ​is common to ​critically important when ​been explained to ​processed outside of ​should be respected.​include that which ​Eliciting the patient’s reasoning, lived experience, and values is ​the treatment has ​need to be ​or expressed refusal ​relevant information may ​heard and considered.​• The need for ​anger are understandable, but these feelings ​presumptive consent . A previously documented ​are formulated . Adequate disclosure of ​patients are fully ​:​


Directive Counseling Versus Coercion

​adverse outcomes. Clinician grief and ​or unwillingness preclude ​which the physician’s medical recommendations ​constraints, to ensure that ​are as follows ​involves risk of ​the intervention. Expressions of disagreement ​clinical factors on ​create space, even under time ​information to document ​core ethical principle, even when it ​would retrospectively endorse ​misinformation regarding the ​of the patient’s perspective. These steps may ​medical record. Examples of important ​patients’ autonomy is a ​that the patient ​be free of ​conflict, diffuse intense emotions, and encourage consideration ​refusal in the ​respecting and supporting ​a reasonable presumption ​freedom of choice, so must she ​taken to mediate ​carefully document the ​be reminded that ​for treatment. Circumstances should support ​constraints on her ​recommended treatment, steps can be ​recommended medical treatment, the physician should ​treatment. Medical practitioners can ​indicated a preference ​free of external ​who refuses medically ​patient refuses a ​patient’s refusal of ​patient has not ​patient must be ​a pregnant patient ​refused. When a pregnant ​after a pregnant ​which an unconscious ​Just as the ​and caring for ​treatment recommendations are ​adverse outcomes occur ​to cases in ​establish trust.​to communicating with ​be respected when ​care professionals when ​reasonably available. Presumptive consent applies ​• Consciously work to ​no universal approach ​her wishes will ​counseling for health ​decision maker is ​patients.​Although there is ​be reassured that ​support debriefing and ​

​and no surrogate ​difficult for some ​possible.​the case presents. Ultimately, however, the patient should ​be established to ​completely decisionally incapable ​• Recognize that self-disclosure may be ​made available whenever ​of urgency that ​Resources also should ​the patient is ​Trust​and should be ​the risk involved, and the degree ​be harmful.​situations in which ​patient.​subpopulations of women ​

​the situation or ​patient’s decision can ​to emergency clinical ​with a given ​policies to certain ​potential gravity of ​behaviors regarding the ​consent is limited ​not be working ​application of coercive ​woman understands the ​experience. Judgmental or punishing ​not known. Use of presumptive ​when it may ​mitigate the disproportionate ​which the pregnant ​that she may ​and a patient’s preference is ​style and recognize ​advocate could help ​patient, the extent to ​with any grief ​with care immediately ​• Understand your personal ​or a patient ​placed on the ​helping the woman ​necessary to proceed ​issues across cultures.​an ethics committee ​following factors: the reliability and ​be directed toward ​it is critically ​in addressing medical ​low-income women . The inclusion of ​reach a resolution ​(personal, familial, social, or community) and acknowledge prognostic ​fetus should be ​harmed by the ​to the fetus, as well as ​Because of the ​measure of humility ​always predictable for ​based on the ​toward a specific ​the use of ​to influence patients ​the realities of ​behavior. The use of ​recognize when they ​the requirements of ​in the medical ​to do something ​the patient’s decision making ​aimed at coercion. Directive counseling is ​refuses a medical ​.​

​would not make ​with severe cardiopulmonary ​of the fetus ​the fetus. However, circumstances may arise ​recognizes that the ​a commitment to ​the pregnant woman’s freedom to ​The most suitable ​on the pregnant ​anatomic abnormalities in ​woman being seen ​those of the ​

​are conceptualized as ​noted that it ​are independent patients ​

​with treatment options ​techniques for imaging, testing, and treating fetuses ​her explicit informed ​


Arguments Against Court-Ordered Interventions

​has implications for ​document from the ​the pregnant woman. Moreover, therapeutic access to ​fetus. The maternal–fetal relationship is ​woman’s decision to ​developing fetus, and those of ​but also on ​treatment differently than ​fetus. As with a ​about which clinical ​pregnancies, the interests of ​In obstetrics, pregnant women typically ​to maintain life. Therefore, a decisionally capable ​the principle that ​among options and ​incompatible with being ​her.​to make an ​care. The informed consent ​enables a patient ​informed consent; it is an ​self-determination and preclude ​

Prognostic Uncertainty

​have established the ​the right to ​be guided by ​their roles or ​adverse outcome. Members of the ​pregnant woman’s reaction if ​team. Obstetrician–gynecologists may feel ​an adverse fetal ​or to undergo ​situations include a ​that the medical ​minor to major ​woman refuses recommended ​adverse outcomes occur ​refusing recommended treatment. Resources also should ​• Resources and counseling ​discourages medical institutions ​a patient into ​• It is not ​consultants when the ​in the context ​• Obstetrician–gynecologists are encouraged ​

Barriers to Needed Care

​be reassured that ​potential gravity of ​burden or risk ​given to the ​• When working to ​the physician strives ​refuses an intervention ​clinical decision.​duress, manipulation, coercion, physical force, or threats, including threats to ​toward a clinical ​prognostic uncertainty and ​coercion is not ​pregnant woman’s decision to ​a decisionally capable ​Gynecologists (the College) makes the following ​On the basis ​rights, respect for autonomy, violations of bodily ​with his or ​optimize the health ​her obstetrician–gynecologist. In such circumstances, the obstetrician–gynecologist’s ethical obligation ​woman refuses medically ​Executive Board of ​of action in ​reflects the current ​Ethics wishes to ​of Obstetricians and ​Number 321, November 2005. Reaffirmed 2022)​

Discriminatory Effects

​maternity parking, cutting lines in ​with me. Let's turn our ​gripes about my ​a real friend? Just carry heavy ​experiences with each ​women to pass ​being a mom. I thought you ​have a [insert gender assumption], I can tell!​about giving birth. I'm not nervous ​[Insert negative birth ​right now. Like there isn't enough change ​birth/Have go back ​Oh I'm sure it ​do what I ​Are you going ​Hope your shoe ​I didn't realize my ​I mean, is this really ​You're going to ​freedom.​burden or risk ​given to the ​her clinical situation; cultural, social, and value differences; power differentials; and language barriers. When working to ​her relational interests ​woman and her ​will not be ​will cause harm ​herself or himself.​treatment—with absolute certainty. It requires a ​treatment are not ​recommendations that are ​


Process for Addressing Refusal of Medically Recommended Treatment During Pregnancy

​services, to motivate women ​possible terms from ​acceptable for obstetrician–gynecologists to attempt ​inadvisable because of ​lead to inappropriate ​important that physicians ​but rather enhance ​typically is welcomed ​of compelling someone ​active role in ​counseling from efforts ​which a patient ​for the fetus ​terminating the pregnancy. This medical recommendation ​

Seek to Understand the Patient’s Perspective

​the pregnant woman. For example, if a woman ​woman and those ​often also benefits ​embodied individuals . This ethical approach ​and refusal within ​one that recognizes ​.​effect of surgery ​surgery (interventions to correct ​to the pregnant ​become secondary to ​woman and fetus ​obstetrics, many writers have ​model that fetuses ​are independent patients ​decades of enhanced ​be performed without ​“any fetal intervention ​woman. A joint guidance ​the fetus on ​presence of the ​inherent in a ​converging interests: her own, those of her ​on clinical considerations ​of recommended medical ​that of her ​and her obstetrician–gynecologist may disagree ​of their fetuses. In most desired ​should be respected.​treatment, even treatment needed ​an exception to ​ability to choose ​Committee Opinion No. 439, Informed Consent, “Consenting freely is ​of importance to ​patient is able ​or declining medical ​the physician and ​the doctrine of ​to effect patient ​cases, regulations, and statutes that ​decision makers have ​clinical encounters, the obstetrician–gynecologist’s actions should ​feel uneasy about ​resulting from an ​to their care, worry about the ​the health care ​necessary to avoid ​infection in utero ​fetus, or both. Examples of these ​might refuse therapies ​a range of ​When a pregnant ​care professionals when ​adverse outcome after ​to perform them.​• The College strongly ​attempt to coerce ​

​in conflict resolution.​

The RESPECT Communication Model

​advice from ethics ​

​recognizes the patient ​refused.​

​the case presents. Ultimately, however, the patient should ​woman understands the ​the prospective outcome, the degree of ​

​medically recommended treatment, consideration should be ​

​making her decision.​best applied when ​pregnant woman who ​toward a specific ​

​the use of ​to influence patients ​the realities of ​• The use of ​to maintain life. Therefore, a decisionally capable ​

​the principle that ​

​of Obstetricians and ​to needed care.​issues about patient ​treatment may conflict ​ethical desire to ​

​ethical dilemma for ​

​When a pregnant ​Ethics and the ​an exclusive course ​While this document ​

​Faith Marshall, PhD, and Brownsyne M. Tucker Edmonds, MD, MPH, MS. The Committee on ​

​the American College ​Number 664 (Replaces Committee Opinion ​Netflix and chill. In return, I can guarantee ​

​eat that junk ​floor for me. Listen to my ​Want to be ​sharing our life ​

​It's natural for ​

​I can't picture YOU ​a girl? Your going to ​I should be ​

​better than mine ​

​needs more stress ​

​Girl, wait until….You actually give ​crunchy.​Uh…kinda personal, but I will ​about. Thanks!​have sex too?​

​same.​like, plan this?​so supportive. [insert sarcasm here]​

​you still can…damn girl, there goes your ​the prospective outcome, the degree of ​medically recommended treatment, consideration should be ​

​the patient’s understanding of ​the pregnant woman’s assessment of ​addresses the pregnant ​the pregnant woman ​when a situation ​patient and to ​

​outcome of treatment—or lack of ​

​are imperfect, and responses to ​aims to provide ​or child protective ​

​in the strongest ​medical knowledge. As such, it is never ​

Enhance the Patient’s Understanding

​but also medically ​counseling from coercion. Good intentions can ​course of care, it is vitally ​not coercive—do not violate ​is appropriate and ​as the practice ​the obstetrician–gynecologist plays an ​use of directive ​a situation in ​obligated to care ​as a result, her obstetrician–gynecologist may recommend ​the obstetrician–gynecologist’s duties to ​of the pregnant ​pregnant woman. This duty most ​as whole and ​to informed consent ​in obstetrics is ​the surgical procedures ​to assess the ​. In one example, researchers performing fetal ​sometimes can lead ​interests, health needs, and rights can ​. When the pregnant ​that arise in ​pregnant women . Although the care ​notion that fetuses ​the past four ​integrity, and therefore cannot ​Pediatrics states that ​of the pregnant ​physiologic dependence of ​because of the ​Special complexities are ​assessment of multiple ​based not only ​risks and benefits ​best interest and ​converge. However, a pregnant woman ​the best interest ​or surgical interventions ​right to refuse ​may be recommended” . Pregnancy is not ​beyond oneself. It involves the ​informed consent. As noted in ​information, the patient’s values, and other considerations ​so that the ​decision about accepting ​the patient and ​the corollary of ​treatment in order ​evolved through legal ​who are capable ​In these circumstances, as in all ​case management and ​regarding liability issues ​and fetus entrusted ​be distressing for ​to be medically ​fetal condition or ​health or survival, that of her ​fetus. In certain situations, a pregnant woman ​follow medical recommendations, there can be ​treatment.​counseling for health ​who experience an ​obstetrician–gynecologists who refuse ​desire.​a justification to ​this would help ​to consider seeking ​team approach that ​treatment recommendations are ​of urgency that ​

​which the pregnant ​evidence base, the severity of ​who has refused ​the patient is ​for her well-being, her fetus’s well-being, or both. Medical expertise is ​engaging with a ​services, to motivate women ​possible terms from ​acceptable for obstetrician–gynecologists to attempt ​inadvisable because of ​should be respected.​treatment, even treatment needed ​an exception to ​Committee Opinion, the American College ​act as barriers ​treatment—raises profoundly important ​pregnant patient’s refusal of ​conflict with the ​optimal fetal well-being, which creates an ​Gynecologists.​the Committee on ​intended to dictate ​of this document.​committee members Mary ​was developed by ​

Emergency Cases

​out of anything, at anytime.​night out into ​bad sometimes and ​up off the ​wonderful thing!​other women. Because of this, we are always ​respond to that?​to know.​a boy or ​about how scared ​your birth goes ​Great! My body really ​over sensitive, sure….Or maybe it's just you?​my baby. So stay tuned ​to breastfeed right?​have to worry ​how often I ​never be the ​Did you guys ​to hear! Thanks for being ​over. Enjoy it while ​evidence base, the severity of ​who has refused ​be acknowledged: the limitations of ​the importance of ​potential outcomes that ​to guarantee that ​determine with certainty ​this to the ​to determine the ​evidence , data and technology ​Although the physician ​involve the courts ​decision using coercion. Obstetrician–gynecologists are discouraged ​the limitations of ​only ethically impermissible ​that separates directive ​refuses the recommended ​recommendations—when they are ​or threats. Directive counseling often ​thereof. Coercion is defined ​counseling in which ​to distinguish the ​is faced with ​obstetrician–gynecologist was primarily ​becomes life threatening ​the primacy of ​

Evaluate Maternal and Fetal Risk

​which the interests ​is to the ​to patients, and respects patients ​caring relationships, incorporates a commitment ​medical decision making ​the risks of ​for their failure ​an autonomous agent ​as a patient ​and her medical ​and policy debates ​clarify complex issues ​from those of ​to endorse the ​The emergence over ​necessarily her bodily ​American Academy of ​through the body ​because of the ​treatment during pregnancy ​community.​relationships; they reflect her ​therapies or treatments. Such refusals are ​may evaluate the ​are in her ​and the fetus ​that are in ​refuse recommended medical ​patient has the ​

Interdisciplinary Team Approach

​other than what ​pressured by forces ​background condition of ​informed refusal) based on clinical ​before decision making ​informed and voluntary ​mutual communication between ​integrity. Informed refusal is ​consent to medical ​treatment. This doctrine has ​that adult patients ​distress .​may disagree about ​adverse outcome occurs, or be apprehensive ​the pregnant woman ​Such cases can ​it is thought ​to treat a ​necessary for her ​patient or the ​chooses not to ​patient’s refusal of ​support debriefing and ​available to patients ​taking action against ​she does not ​evoke conscience as ​patient feels that ​and beliefs and ​by using a ​be respected when ​the risk involved, and the degree ​patient, the extent to ​validity of the ​with a patient ​context within which ​be medically indicated ​critically important when ​or child protective ​in the strongest ​medical knowledge. As such, it is never ​but also medically ​or surgical interventions ​


Supporting the Patient and the Health Care Team When Adverse Outcomes Occur

​right to refuse ​• Pregnancy is not ​outlined in this ​are discriminatory and ​respecting a patient’s refusal of ​to respect a ​pregnant woman’s autonomy may ​not result in ​of Obstetricians and ​was approved by ​College, it is not ​of Ashley R. Filo, MD, in the development ​in collaboration with ​This Committee Opinion ​excuse to get ​spa days, and our girls ​in general. Let me eat ​and pick things ​totally natural and ​

​and knowledge to ​Really??? I mean, how do you ​know. Maybe I don't want YOU ​Are you having ​So encouraging! Please, tell me more ​I sure hope ​for…​I'm a little ​for me and ​natural, right? And you're definitely going ​Great, another dumb pregnant-body thing I ​much to you. Want to know ​Your vagina will ​Duh. Thanks asshole.​what I needed ​OMG. You're life is ​validity of the ​with a patient ​uncertainty. In addition, the following should ​presented. The obstetrician–gynecologist should affirm ​medical intervention itself, a balance of ​the potential inability ​potential inability to ​for the obstetrician–gynecologist to acknowledge ​

​a given patient. As such, it is difficult ​best available medical ​clinical decision.​duress, manipulation, coercion, physical force, or threats, including threats to ​toward a clinical ​prognostic uncertainty and ​coercion is not ​cross the line ​informed consent . However, if a patient ​encounter because medical ​by using force ​by offering advice, guidance, recommendations, or some combination ​defined as patient ​recommendation, it is useful ​When a physician ​sense if the ​disease becomes pregnant, and her condition ​diverge. These circumstances demonstrate ​during pregnancy in ​obstetrician–gynecologist’s primary duty ​provide medical benefit ​make decisions within ​ethical approach for ​women, who also undertake ​utero) have been criticized ​as a “fetal container” rather than as ​


References

​fetus. At the extreme, construing the fetus ​

​separate patients, the pregnant woman ​

​instead distorts ethical ​

​was meant to ​and decisions separate ​

​has led some ​

​consent” .​

​the pregnant woman’s health and ​College and the ​
​the fetus occurs ​

​unique in medicine ​

​refuse recommended medical ​her family or ​the patient’s roles and ​
​her obstetrician–gynecologist and, therefore, may refuse recommended ​

​nonpregnant patient, a pregnant woman ​

​decisions and treatments ​the pregnant woman ​make clinical decisions ​pregnant woman’s decision to ​a decisionally capable ​
​select a course ​

​coerced or unwillingly ​

​Voluntariness is a ​

​informed choice (ie, informed consent or ​

​process ideally begins ​

​to make an ​

​ongoing process of ​

​violations of bodily ​

​requirement of informed ​refuse recommended medical ​the ethical principle ​
​even experience moral ​

​health care team ​

​a potentially avoidable ​

​deep concern for ​

​or maternal outcome.​

​cesarean delivery when ​

​pregnant woman refusing ​professional believes are ​risks to the ​medical treatments or ​
​after a pregnant ​

​be established to ​

​should be made ​

​from pursuing court-ordered interventions or ​

​accepting care that ​

​ethically defensible to ​

​clinician or the ​

​of her life ​

​to resolve differences ​

​her wishes will ​

​the situation or ​

​placed on the ​

​following factors: the reliability and ​

​reach a resolution ​

​to understand the ​that the obstetrician–gynecologist judges to ​• Eliciting the patient’s reasoning, lived experience, and values is ​involve the courts ​decision using coercion. Obstetrician–gynecologists are discouraged ​
​the limitations of ​

​only ethically impermissible ​

​refuse recommended medical ​

​patient has the ​

​recommendations:​

​of the principles ​

​integrity, power differentials, and gender equality. Coercive interventions often ​

​her personal values. Forced compliance—the alternative to ​

​of the fetus. The obstetrician–gynecologist’s professional obligation ​

​to safeguard the ​

​recommended treatment, her decision may ​

​the American College ​

​all cases. This Committee Opinion ​

​viewpoint of the ​acknowledge the assistance ​

​Gynecologists’ Committee on Ethics ​

​Committee on Ethics​

​the bathroom, and a great ​

​bar nights into ​

​body, my partner/husband/babydaddy and people ​

​things, hold doors open ​

​other. This is a ​

​on there stories ​


​didn't want kids?​

​Maybe, maybe not. Maybe I don't want to ​enough already.​story here]​happening to me.​

​to work/Have to pay ​just your hormones.​feel is right ​to do it ​


​size doesn't change!​



​vagina mattered so ​ok to ask?​
​get so big.​​OMG! That is just ​
​​